"JERSEY'S EVENING PROPAGANDA"
do you ever wonder why the (Jersey Evening Post) will not create a comments section for certain stories of vital importance to the people of Jersey ?
Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
Search This Blog
Saturday, 28 December 2013
"Tales Of Plunder - Pirates & Privateers"
AN ARRESTING TALE
you know, with well-trained legal brains.
The following paperwork appeared through
my letter box in August 2013: The Alleged Summons
Take a close look at this alleged
‘charge sheet’, who is Mr Cyril Vibert? It certainly is not me, I was not Christened
Mr by my parents, neither did they call me Mr, Mr is a fictional construct, a
title, a legal person, It is not a human being.
There is a box for a signature why is
it not signed by the constable or one of his centeniers? Why is no one prepared
to take responsibility for this document?
Indeed the only thing in this box is
the company seal of the Parish of St Helier, are these agents saying that I have
a contract with this body corporate? I would very much like to see this alleged
contract. Oh that’s right, there isn't one.
Why didn't the agent of the court, Mr
Mourant, sign instead of write his title and surname? We’ll look at the answers to these questions
This so called ‘charge sheet’ has
about as much lawful significance as a piece of bog roll, albeit not as useful.
Now the Viscount’s letter
Again this is addressed to a legal
fiction, now I know we have been schooled into believing that we are Mr, Mrs,
Ms, Miss, Esq, Sir, etc etc. But we are none of these things, we are real living
beings with a soul and a conscience and as long as we remember this and exercise our
inalienable rights as such, then the corporate judiciary and government must
also remember this (they won’t because they are a criminal outfit).
Notice how the Viscount wants cash, I
have sat through many hours of Magistrate’s Court plunder sessions and can
confirm that the Viscount will only accept cash in court, they will even allow
you to go to an ATM to get the cash, this amounts to thousands of pounds every
session, yet you will not find these figures in the States of Jersey accounts
nor where this considerable sum of money is spent, why not? Are there
commissioners and the likes to pay?
The above documents came a little
while after the usual pro forma
invitation to a parish hall inquiry and then a facsimile template summons to
appear in the Magistrates Court on the 12th August 2013 issued by
the Connetable (Constable) of St. Helier.
Firstly I’ll state for the record
that I have not been charged with any of the alleged offences contained in the
above ‘charge sheet’. So the question is this, is anyone obliged to attend the
Magistrate’s Court (other than as a witness) if they have not been charged with
Answer: Of course not.
Next the pro forma quasi summons was from the Constable of St. Helier, sorry
but I forgot to make a copy of these which I sent back marked “No Contract –
Return to Sender”.
Now obviously the Constable of St.
Heliers’ jurisdiction and authority is limited to within the Parish of St.
Helier. So, does a summons from the Constable of St. Helier create any legal
obligation upon someone who lives outside of the Parish of St. Helier? – No it
does not, but let us not forget that this is Jersey with it's Alice in Wonderland
make it up as you go along ‘justice system’.
You would have thought that the
Magistrates with their planet sized legal minds would have picked up on such
glaring problems, but no, according to the Viscounts’ dept. the Magistrate (no
clue as to which one) issued an arrest order. Strange how these mythical arrest
orders never seem to see the light of day, I have yet to see one of these
orders signed by a Magistrate, maybe they’re shy.
Even the court jesters (sometimes
called Magistrates) know better than to sign an unlawful order.
Despite threats of immediate arrest
by Viscounts officers (basically bailiffs for our non-Jersey readers) I have
carried on living my life.
The Viscounts Dept. is infested with
lawyers so it is not clear to me what they mean by ‘immediate arrest’ could it
have some kind of secret legalese meaning.
Why more than 4 months after the
alleged ‘arrest order’ have I not been arrested, I did not pay any bail nor
will I. Have they just forgotten? Or do they have so many ‘arrest orders’
outstanding that they have not got around to me yet? Do you dear readers think either is likely?
Nor do I. So what is happening here?
One of the essential elements of any
court case is jurisdiction, for criminal and quasi criminal matters a court
must establish in-personam jurisdiction; a court cannot lawfully proceed
against you without establishing jurisdiction over you. And at no time has the
court established jurisdiction over me, you see, if you go to court under your
own steam for statutory matters, you have, simply by turning up, tacitly
consented to in-personam jurisdiction even if you dispute jurisdiction once in
court. The courts presumption of tacit consent to jurisdiction will stand no
matter what argument or rebuttal you care to use, I know this because I’ve
tried most of them.
By not going to court the alleged Magistrate
was unable to claim that jurisdiction was established either tacitly or
expressly, no jurisdiction, no case to answer. Magistrates and the lawyers from the
Viscount’s Department know this full well.
The glaringly obvious truth is that a
Magistrate’s Oath of Office does not allow or authorise them to administrate
legislation. When Bridget Shaw, or whoever is sitting in court administrating
legislation they are acting as a private Commissioner not as a Magistrate and a
nice commission it must be considering
all that lovely cash coming in through the box office every day. You see
why a ‘Magistrate’ might be loathed to confirm their Oath of Office in court and
in so doing limit their ability to act in any other capacity at that same
From the Bailiffs’ office we have the
Magistrates Oath of Office with English translation
Publicly sworn, before god, upholding the rights of the Queen and her
subjects, in accordance with the laws and customs of this Island.
All of this confirms that this Oath
is a common law Oath; the swearer is promising to uphold common law when using
It does not authorise a Magistrate to
However nothing in legislation or law
forbids Bridget Shaw, Peter Harris et al from working as a private commissioner
after their work as a Magistrate is finished.
Magistrates have no problem giving
lawful orders and signing both orders and warrants, private commissioners are
far more reluctant as it is them personally, and not the ‘court’ who is
responsible for their actions and orders.
Asking these well paid private
commissioners questions they don’t want to answer is not only revealing but laugh
out loud mad;
Me to Bridget Shaw“what jurisdiction is the
court presuming here?”
BS;“The Magistrates court is a
creature of statute”.
A CREATURE, WTF? No doubt this SEA
CREATURE has tentacles and big sharp teeth.
A creature or court of statute,
statute (act, enactment etc.) is just lawyers fancy way of saying a tribunal
Of course it gets more serious when an
important question and the answer vanish from the official court recording. See the rather stunning posting on the link below, a must read.
From the start of my various
appearances in ‘court’ for ‘statutory offences’ I would ask the ‘Magistrate’ “Are you operating under your Oath of Office at this time” not once did any so
called magistrate give a responsive answer, they would obfuscate by saying
things like “I am not prepared to enter into a discussion about that”You what!!! Only a corrupt or disingenuous mind would interpret asking for a simple yes/no
answer to a question as calling for a discussion.
Compare this to my later appearances
for the common law offence of contempt of court, when asked the same question
about their Oath of Office both Richard Falle and Bridget Shaw had no
hesitation in answering “yes”. These crooks think we were born yesterday, and
that we are not capable of leading them into answers that show how they are
abusing their public positions and the law.
I’ve spent a lot of hours at the
Magistrates court both appearing and listening to other cases so I’ve noticed a
few things, like all the common law proper crime stuff is usually dealt with
first and swiftly so the lawyers can get down and dirty making wonga.
Policed by consent and governed by consent means
exactly what it says.
I consent to be bound by common law,
I do not consent to be bound by legislation created by a de facto corporate
government unless I am acting as a government agent or am engaged in commerce.
Jersey has, in effect and fact, a
privatised justice system (sic) the private members only BAR Association and
its junior affiliate the Law Society control justice on this island. The
membership by invitation only BAR Association (an Unincorporated Body
Corporate) which is chartered through the Inns of Court, situated within the
City of London Corporation and the CROWN whose address is Crown officer, Crown
office row, Chancery lane, CITY OF LONDON, are not government bodies, are not public
institutions, have no natural authority to determine how our justice system
should operate, rather they are a collection of people who have joined together
to promote their, and their fellow members standing and earning potential and
who are not held accountable by lazy and/or corrupt politicians.
This arrangement is financially beneficial
for both government and lawyers they will not give up this scam lightly.
But I digress
So what have I been up to since these
threats of arrest, well, straight from the 'you couldn’t make this shit up' department, I
was employed on a temporary contract with authorisation to access the computer
system, keys and card swipe to buildings whilst working for;
THE STATES OF JERSEY.
A case of the right hand not knowing what
the left is doing?
If there is one thing lawyers hate
more than ordinary people learning their deceptive ways, it is people who make
What are the odds of me being
arrested after this posting?