Search This Blog

Sunday, 3 February 2013

"Iceland Is Getting Closer For England - The Open Letter By Veronica Chapman" Part 2

"The People Have Had Enough"

"Acta Non Verba"

Open letter to David Cameron from Veronica Chapman

To the Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP, Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury, and the Rt. Hon. George Osborne MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer.

We are writing to you not as our political leaders but as our elected servants in government who are duty bound by oath of office to uphold the Law of the Land as inserted into Magna Carta 1215 and to protect our ancient sovereignty from foreign intrusion.

Please also understand that this is not a polite request - this is a lawful demand to bring to an immediate end Her Majesty's Government's involvement with the unlawful debt-creating banking system that is currently endangering the future well-being, happiness and sovereignty of the British nation.

What follows are historical and provable facts. Failure by yourselves to immediately carry out this lawful demand and to redress our legitimate grievance will leave you both vulnerable to lawful arrest by the British people on the charge of treason.

Detailed research has now exposed that unlawful activities are being undertaken by Her Majesty's Government at the behest of a corrupt and fraudulent international banking cartel.

Led by the world's elite banking families, this unlawful cabal operates through a shadowy network of high level and secretive 'think tanks' (including the Bilderberg Group which you are both very familiar with) as well as quasi international conferences where unashamed globalist agendas are displayed in such a way by a compliant mainstream media as to gain public acceptance by hiding the real truth.

One such long term criminal agenda is the eventual creation of a European Union superstate by the use of stealth, deception and massive unlawful debt. To succeed here must result in the obvious demise of the United Kingdom as a sovereign nation and any involvement by British politicians with such an agenda has to be seen, under our ancient and tested Common Law, as a clear case of treason.

But the real treason currently being carried out on the British people by Her Majesty's Government involves the nation's money supply. The crippling debt burden that is currently shaping the fiscal policies and strategies of our nation has been arrived at by unlawful means. The so-called 'Deficit' and 'National Debt', which are causing increasing misery for law abiding families and businesses, not to mention putting at risk our nation's defences, only exist as a direct result of allowing the private banks to be involved in our nation's money supply.

As you both know only too well, the private banking corporations, with the gold standard no longer applicable, create money completely out of thin air - just numbers on a computer screen, using so-called ‘fractional reserve lending’. Once this ‘nothingness’ has been transferred over to Her Majesty’s Treasury, we, the poor taxpayers, have to pay real and earned money to meet the repayments not to mention the interest on this ‘nothingness’. It is also a simple fact that the private banks create absolutely nothing to cover the interest demanded thus adding to the nation's ever-increasing debt burden – it becomes a simple case of robbing ‘Peter’ to pay ‘Paul’. This has to be viewed not as clever economics but as a clear case of fraud under Common Law.

The increasing austerity measures being undertaken by Her Majesty's Government, along with the highly invasive and complex taxation system needed to raise ‘real’ money to pay back the bankers’ ‘nothingness’, is creating a country that is now becoming increasingly subservient to debt and fear. However, there is one simple action that you can both take that will reverse our nation's financial misfortunes overnight.......and there are two historical precedents to prove it can be done!

From reliable inside sources, we now know the full truth about money supply. ‘Money' is simply a convenient unit of exchange for goods and services that people have complete confidence in. Contrary to what the private bankers and the Bank of England (and its controller, the Bank for International Settlements) would have you believe, any sovereign nation has the lawful and moral right to issue through its treasury its own debt-free and interest-free money based on nothing more than the wealth, integrity and potential of that nation. Private debt-creating banking and central banks have absolutely no place in the lawful creation and issuance of a country's money supply.

This being the case, we now wish to draw to your attention these two historical precedents which give absolute credence to this fiscal principle of national credit. In other words, there is nothing whatsoever to stop Her Majesty’s Treasury from being able to issue debt-free and interest-free treasury notes for the well-being, security and happiness of the British people.

The first precedent comes from America. At the height of the American Civil War, the US Treasury warned President Lincoln that further funding would be needed if the Federal North was to have the resources needed to defeat the Confederate South. The President initially went to the private banks who wanted between 24 and 36 per cent interest. Lincoln knew that if he agreed to take the loans from the bankers that he would be putting his country into a debt noose that would strangle the economic prosperity out of his country and which would almost be impossible to pay off.

On the advice of a businessman with proven integrity, Colonel Dick Taylor from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln then made the momentous and lawful decision to print debt-free and interest-free paper money based on nothing more than the honour of the American Government. Called ‘Greenbacks’ because they were coloured green on one side only, the US Treasury issued 450 million dollars worth of these notes and they were immediately accepted as legal tender by a willing and grateful nation. The war was eventually won and this very popular new paper currency seemed set to continue. However, with the assassination of Lincoln just after the end of hostilities, his Greenback legacy sadly died with him as the private bankers managed to ‘persuade’ Congress to revoke this successful initiative in favour of the debt-creating National Banking Act which eventually led to the formation of the privately run Federal Reserve in 1913. Since then, America’s unlawful debt has risen to over 15 trillion dollars.

The second precedent is much closer to home. At the outbreak of the First World War, the Bank of England and the private bankers, fearing that people would rush to withdraw their money thus setting in motion a run on the banks, went to see Lloyd George, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer. He quickly rushed through the Currency and Bank Notes Act 1914 which allowed His Majesty’s Treasury to immediately start issuing debt-free treasury notes based on the credit worthiness of the country. Having extended the August 3rd Bank Holiday by a further three days, the banks reopened for business on August 7th with these new treasury notes being immediately accepted as legitimate money by the British people. The next few months saw some £300 million of these ‘Bradbury’ treasury notes being printed thus effectively averting any possible financial crisis as Britain mobilised for the struggle ahead.

However, the private bankers, realising that these debt-free Bradburys would prevent them from making obscene profits from this terrible war, ‘persuaded’ Lloyd George to agree to phase out the debt-free treasury notes in favour of returning to the more conventional loans from the banks whereby interest would be added. The result of this ‘about turn’ in favour of the bankers was to see Britain’s National Debt go up from £650 million in 1914 to a staggering £7,500 million in 1919.

So there we have it! Our demand is simple and direct. There is absolutely nothing to stop you, David Cameron, and you, George Osborne, from creating a 21st century ‘Bradbury’ Treasury note based upon the wealth, integrity and potential of the British nation - indeed, according to the Office of National Statistics in 2010, our Human Capital alone is estimated at £17.12 trillion! This one action would immediately restore Britain’s sovereignty, economy and industries not to mention the well-being, security and happiness of the British people. As regards the Deficit and the National Debt, these will be taken care of by our ancient and tested Common Law – a jury will decide as to their lawfulness and if both were deemed to have been arrived at by unlawful means, then they will be declared null and void.

The same applies to our membership of the European Union. If a jury decides that our original membership of the EEC was arrived at by the use of deliberate deception, as many believe it was, then our membership must be declared null and void resulting in immediate withdrawal with no referendum being required.

In conclusion, may we please remind you again that this is not a letter inviting further debate - it is a demand for immediate remedy and redress. Failure to comply with this lawful demand to remove the British economy from the clutches of the criminal bankers by restoring our sovereign right to issue our own debt-free money will leave you both open to the charge of treason. People are now waking up to what is really going on and we have lost patience with the criminality and treason currently being practised by our elected servants in Parliament as they continue to distress our country’s sovereignty and ability to defend itself.

As a lawful demand, and in recognition of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, we, the undersigned, will now allow you a period of forty days from the date of this letter to make the necessary arrangements within Her Majesty's Treasury in order to create a new sovereign, debt-free money supply based on the wealth, integrity and potential of our nation to meet the future security, well-being and happiness of the British people.

Iceland has already stood up to the bankers and won - now it's our turn!

Yours sincerely


  1. Say what you will about the Freeman Movement, but one things for sure, with our knowledge of the common law there's no bullshit, and no messing about!!!

  2. Starting at the end of this week, Cyril will be doing a detailed three part posting on the theory of anthropogenic global warming, it promises to be a real eye opener.

  3. I can't wait to see if Cyril has been taken in by denialist propaganda, misdirection and decepetion or not!

  4. Nick, the earth warms up and cools down all the time....fact!

  5. Palmer will attack anything anyone writes about global warming which does not agree totally with his opinion, he has a business that banks on global warming being a certainty.

  6. Anon @February 04, 2013 11:34 AM

    "he has a business that banks on global warming being a certainty"

    You don't know what the hell you're talking about. I have no such business. I wish I did because I might finally get some remuneration for trying to turn aside the tidal waves of stupidity and denial in the public domain.

    "Palmer will attack anything anyone writes about global warming which does not agree totally with his opinion"

    My "opinion" is pretty close to that of the scientific mainstream which has been endorsed by every National Academy and major scientific organisation worldwide. These guys are far smarter than you anon. A recent survey of 13000 peer reviewed scientific papers on climate published over the last 21 years found that only 24 papers rejected the connection between carbon emissions and global warming.

    There is a tiny number of maverick scientists who dispute what everyone else sees as obvious but there always is, and has been, in science. All major advances in science had tiny minorities who never accepted them - relativity,quantum mechanics, genetics etc etc. The crackpot fringe get left behind and forgotten - dumped in the dustbin of history. As we are still living through the development of climate science, the crackpot fringe are still being fawned over by ill-informed people of bad judgement and prejudiced views to bolster their own wishful thinking.

    Sceptical scientists like Richard Lindzen, Spencer and Christy, Plimer, Pielke, Carter - even non scientific proven misleading demagogue types like Monckton agree that - and are on video and statements saying that - CO2 has caused warming and will continue to and that that warming is almost entirely down to our fossil fuel emissions and some due to land use changes such as deforestation and agriculture.

    Satellites have measured, and continue to measure, the radiation imbalance caused by the increase in CO2. Those irresponsible gullible types who believe the tidal waves of denial and simple minded propaganda around are so irrational that they are in denial of one simple fact - that if the radiation input to a planet stays the same and the inhabitants alter the chemical constituents of the atmosphere so that the rate of radiation output to space is reduced, then the planet will certainly warm up until it reaches a new equilibrium temperature. That is 100% definite. Any one arguing against that is away with the fairies.

  7. Hi Nick, I think you'll find that relativity was not accepted by main stream science for close on twenty years after Einstein first published.Alfred Wegener was vilified for 40 years for his theory of continental drift (plate tectonics). Not forgetting Copernicus and his mad heliocentric view of the solar system.
    Science is often advance by outliers, consensus is one of the logical fallicies most used by those without good arguement as is the fallicy of composition.


  8. Oh come on Cyril, you'll have to try harder than that. You didn't appear to understand that what I wrote was perfectly compatible with the examples in your response. I never stated that relativity et al was accepted straight away - new science rarely is. What I was referring to was the small minority of mavericks, eccentrics and self-opinionated egotists who cling onto their beliefs long after the majority have accepted the new ideas. To use your examples, I meant the people who clung onto an Earth centred view of the Universe long after Copernicus set them straight 500 years ago - also the people who dispute plate tectonics today. Capisce?

    Greenhouse gas theory and global warming science has been established for over 150 years but didn't start to get widely accepted until the 1950s onwards - which is even longer than your examples.

    Ever since then, a growing number of scientists accepted the science and a dwindling number disputed it. That number of disputers is now extremely small.

    You also demonstrate that you don't understand the true meaning or use of the "consensus" logical fallacy either but that would be more complicated to explain to you here.

    If you were as familiar with the development of the denier/ deceptive propaganda movement as I am you would know that many of the "arguments" that you probably find so convincing are actually resurrected scientific queries that were legitimately raised 50 years ago. They were adequately settled back then and the science moved on but the deceitful propagandists resurrected them in the 90s and 00s because they knew there was one born every minute who would be fooled by the inherent plausibility to think that they were newly thought out objections from genuine sceptics.