Search This Blog

Saturday, 19 January 2013

"Common Law - Admiralty Law - And Your Straw Man" Part 28



"Jersey Judiciary's Customary Deception

About Common Law"


Before we start this posting, we would like the reader to know, and acknowledge, that anything in this posting is "NOT" Legal Advice, and should "NOT" be perceived as such. Everything written here is merely our own theory.
Please also note, that anyone using these tactics or copying what we have done here, "MUST" know how to defend themselves properly in a courtroom. Lawyer's and Judges have a wealth of knowledge and trickery to get you to consent to their codes of practice, thereby rendering you liable to their penalties after you have been coaxed into giving up your "Inalienable Rights".
"Common Law is the greatest protection anyone has against tyrannical Government and injustice. The States of Jersey have trampled the Law of the land into the dirt."

"The Great Deception"

Common Law Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man,




"The Myth Of Customary Law"

We hear from the judiciary and other lawyers that Jersey is a customary law jurisdiction, what they omit to say is that the term customary law is just a colloquialism for common law. Having said that, (Magistrate) Peter Harris did once tell me in court that we do not have common law in Jersey we have customary law, but then he is not the sharpest quill in the ink well.

Common law is customary, not codified or written, rather it is the product of long evolved social values developed in England. English common law (or just common law as it is more generally known as) is built, solely on the principles of justice and justice is our inalienable right to defend ourselves from those who would violate our rights. So you see common law is not rocket science, it is basic common sense held as truth by all rational people.

Some say Jersey customary law comes from ancient Norman French statutes, long ago revoked in France, this is an oxymoron, as statutes, are by their very definition not part of common/customary law. Statutes are the legislative rules of a society, given the force of law, by the consent of the governed. Statutes are law arbitrary (revocable and made at the whim of politicians) whereas common law (the law of the land) is immutable, no politician or group of politicians can revoke the laws for murder, rape, assault, theft, fraud etc.




But wait a minute bi-cri, as the Bailhache boys might exclaim, Jersey has the right to and does make its own laws! Quite right Mr B’s, indeed every self-governing British Territory and Dependency has the right to legislate or enact their own statutory ‘laws’. However, this does not abrogate common law or alter the fact that we are a common law jurisdiction, Jersey becoming 'independent' would, and that’s why Phick Phil has wet dreams about us being independent of Great Britain. You see, simply by virtue of being part of Great Britain and the Commonwealth, Jersey is a Common Law island, 1066 and all that.

If we were to ever lose our Common Law status, the Bailhache Bros would abandon all law apart from statutory law, we would then be subjected to the arbitrary whims and punishments of their choosing for any dissent toward the State.

Let’s look at a few official documents relating to the customary/common law standpoints.
Below are some ‘rap sheets’ i.e. records of crimes/offences and the laws used to convict.






   

Notice how contempt of court is a common law offence, now, I was charged under the common law offence of contempt of court for not attending a statutory law court hearing? This swapping of jurisdiction is further evidence of how the judiciary over here just make it up as they go along.

Here’s one in the lawyers own words;

Police Force (Prescribed Offences) (Jersey) Order 1974
THE HOME AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, in pursuance of Article 6 of the Police Force (Jersey) Law 1974,[1] orders as follows –
Commencement [see endnotes]


1      ‎
The prescribed offences for the purposes of the Police Force (Jersey) Law 1974[2] are those offences set out in the Schedule to this Order.
2      ‎
This Order may be cited as the Police Force (Prescribed Offences) (Jersey) Order 1974.

SCHEDULE

PART 1 COMMON LAW OFFENCES
  1.
Abduction.
  2.
Abortion.
  3.
Affray
  4.
Arson.
  5.
Assaults of every description, except minor assaults.
  6.
Bigamy.
  7.
Blackmail and cognate offences.
  8.
Breaking and entering with intent; illegal entry with intent.
  9.
Breaking prison.
10.
Concealment of birth.
11.
Conspiracy.
12.
Frauds of all kinds; e.g. embezzlement, false pretences, forgery, falsification of accounts, etc.
13.
Homicide of every description.
14.
Inciting to commit crime.
15.
Kidnapping.
16.
Larceny of every description, except of a trivial nature.
17.
Libel.
18.
Malicious damage, except damage of a trivial nature.
19.
Obscene publications.
20.
Offences within the exclusive jurisdiction of Her Majesty.
21.
Perjury and cognate offences.
22.
Perversion of the course of justice.
23.
Receiving, hiding or withholding stolen property.
24.
Robbery.
25.
Sexual offences of all kinds.

PART 2 STATUTORY OFFENCES
Offences against the following enactments:  –
  1.
Control of Borrowing (Jersey) Law 1947.
  2.
Children (Jersey) Law 1969 – Part 12.
  3.
Civil Aviation Act 1949 (Channel Islands) Order 1953.
  4.
Civil Aviation Act 1971 (Channel Islands) Order 1972.
  5.
Copyright – Loi (1913) au sujet des Droits d’Auteur, and Loi (1908) au sujet des Droits de Compositeurs.
  6.
Cremation (Jersey) Law 1953.
  7.
Currency Offences (Jersey) Law 1952.
  8.
Dangerous Drugs (Jersey) Law 1954.
  9.
Decimal Currency (Jersey) Law 1971.
10.
Depositors and Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967.
11.
Diseases of Animals (Jersey) Law 1956, Article 38(2).
12.
Distilleries, Loi de 1860 sur les
13.
Droit Criminel, Loi (1895) modifiant le
14.
Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Jersey) Law 1964.
15.
Exchange Control Act 1947 (Channel Islands) Order 1947.
16.
Explosives – Loi (1884) sur les Matières Explosives.
17.
Explosives (Jersey) Law 1970.
18.
Firearms (Jersey) Law 1956.
19.
Fire Service (Jersey) Law 1959, Article 19.
20.
Gambling (Jersey) Law 1964.
21.
Geneva Conventions Act 1957.
22.
Genocide (Jersey) Law 1969.
23.
Hawkers and Non-Resident Traders (Jersey) Law 1965, Part 3.
24.
Hijacking Act 1971 (Jersey) Order 1971.
25.
Immigration (Jersey) Order 1972 (1971 Act)
26.
Impôts, Loi (1845) sur la régie des, Article 18.
27.
Licensing (Jersey) Law 1974, Article 84.
28.
Liquid Fuel, Control of, (Jersey) Regulations 1974.
29.
Marine etc. Broadcasting (Offences) (Jersey) Order 1967.
30.
Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969, Articles 36, 37 and 38.
31.
Merchandise Marks (Jersey) Law 1958.
32.
Merchant Shipping Acts.
33.
Milk (Sale to Special Classes) (Jersey) Regulations 1974.
34.
Motor Traffic (Jersey) Law 1935, Article 50.[3]
35.
Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948, Article 18.
36.
Motor Vehicle Duty (Jersey) Law 1957, Article 15.
37.
Official Secrets (Jersey) Law 1952.
38.
Patents (Jersey) Law 1957.
39.
Places of Refreshment (Jersey) Law 1967, Article 16.
40.
Post Office (Jersey) Law 1969.
41.
Printed Papers (Jersey) Law 1954.
42.
Prison (Jersey) Law 1957, Articles 20 and 30.
43.
Rassemblements Tumultueux, 1797.
44.
Registered Designs (Jersey) Law 1957.
45.
Restriction of Offensive Weapons (Jersey) Law 1960.
46.
Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Articles 18(1), 27, 53 and 54(2).
47.
Telecommunications (Jersey) Law 1972.
48.
Tokyo Convention Act 1967 (Jersey) Order 1969.
49.
Trade Marks (Jersey) Law 1958.


Are any of the offences above described as customary?

There are many popular misconceptions about common law, one of the most persistent is that Judges and case-law make the common law, this does not stand up to any close scrutiny, common law predates any form of professional Judges and lawyers by many centuries, it is correct to say that Judges and case-law confirm and establish in writing the ancient principles of common law. 

Judges interpretations, case-law and precedent also refine and develop statutory law, but that is a whole other ball game, and interpretations are after all, just opinions.

The legal profession deliberately confuse people into thinking black is white, here is an example from comments at another Blog;  

“law does not always benefit everyone. That's pretty obvious. In the 16th and 17th centuries it was applied in Jersey to burn people as witches - that was the Royal Court, not the Ecclesiastical Court. Laws supported slavery and the slave trade. You can probably think of thousands of bad laws. But bad laws can be changed, The either by politicians elected on a mandate of reform, or pressure from individuals or organisations such as trade unions. No one ever said the system was perfect, no system is. It is always a compromise of sorts. But people brought in laws - statute laws - outlawing slave trading and slavery, improving workers conditions, bringing in social security etc. I'm not a believer in the Whig idea of history that everything is getting better, but there have been some improvements over the last 50 years even (as well as some setbacks).”
And

"I understand the Freemen swear allegiance to Common Law, so they are not exactly anarchists."

Not as I understand it. There is a lot of criticism on the local website about the Statute laws all being in French, but if they'd done any digging - e.g. Stephanie Nicholle's book on the origins and development of Jersey common law - you'll see that it will pretty well all be French! In fact one of them boasts that they don't understand French, and the law should be in English. Well, if you want common law, then you will need a translator.

English common law has developed separately, but why should that be applied in Jersey. There is not a single "common law" which is universal across all countries - Scotland again has its own unique brand.

Why should English common law be privileged by someone in Jersey? Surely Jersey common law should be the basis for their arguments? Or is the "common law" defence really something of a red herring?”

Firstly, taking seriously any notorious Jersey lawyer’s opinion on common law is akin to acting on the views of a paedophile regarding the age of consent!!!

As for burning witches and slavery, statutes were not needed, slavery has always been unlawful under common law, so too, the burning of witches.


Witchfinder General - Ian Le Marquand

These activities came about because of the interests of powerful self-serving political blocs, who ignored common law for their own motives. The aristocracy and landed gentry in the case of slavery and the Church who condoned burning people as heretics or witches.

We see the same abrogation/ignoring of the law of the land today, oligarchy controlled governments are unlawfully putting statutes above common law in an attempt to bring about a ‘strict liability’ corporate state where our individual freedoms and rights are being eroded on an almost weekly basis, the result of which will be a fascist state.

I have been asked “Do governments have the right to make laws?”
The answer is yes and no.

Yes, governments have the right, and indeed the duty to make laws (statutes) to regulate commerce, because the profit motive of commerce has the potential to cause immense harm to communities.

And

No, governments are forbidden to make laws for the people, absent our individual consent.
This is provable by looking at maxims of law, the rules of law and applying logic;




a) There is a hierarchy to law, this is as follows;

1) God (whatever that means to you, God is not defined).
2) People.
3) Governments.
4) Corporations and other legal fiction persons.

The rule of the hierarchy of law is that the created cannot have a claim (make laws) on the creator.


b) This is also expressed in the maxim of law that states;

“The law gives rise to fictions, not fictions the law.”

Legally speaking, governments are fictions.


c) Everyone is equal under the law. So how can politicians make laws for us, absent our consent?


d) Politicians and government employees are public servants, since when do servants make laws for the Masters?


Again, we don’t have to be Einstein to see how the relationship between the people and government is being turned on its head and rapidly deteriorating.


To finish this post we have an interesting extract from Wikipedia;

Common law legal systems in the present day





  Civil law
  Common law
  Bijuridical (Civil and Common law)
The common law constitutes the basis of the legal systems of: England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Ireland, federal law in the United States and the law of individual U.S. states (except Louisiana), federal law throughout Canada and the law of the individual provinces and territories (except Quebec), Australia (both federal and individual states), Kenya, New Zealand, South Africa, India,Myanmar,[9] Malaysia, Bangladesh, Brunei, Pakistan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, The Bahamas, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, St. Vincent and the Granadines, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Trinidad and Tobago, and many other generally English-speaking countries or Commonwealth countries (except Scotland, which is bijuridicial, and Malta). Essentially, every country that was colonised at some time by England, Great Britain, or the United Kingdom uses common law except those that were formerly colonised by other nations, such as Quebec (which follows the law of France in part), South Africa and Sri Lanka (which follow Roman Dutch law), where the prior civil law system was retained to respect the civil rights of the local colonists. India uses common law except in the state of Goa which retains the Portuguese civil code. Guyana and Saint Lucia have mixed Common Law and Civil Law systems.



Below, is the same map two years ago, note that the only country using Customary Law is Mongolia! They got rid of it in 2010



The link to the Wikipedia maps is below



Ian & Cyril


And please sign the petition below to help rid the Isle of Jersey of these disgusting crooks.






11 comments:

  1. (Magistrate) Peter Harris did once tell me in court that we do not have common law in Jersey we have customary law, but then he is not the sharpest quill in the ink well.

    Ex copper thats most probably why

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for taking the initiative to assist in the task to overhaul the Crooked, Corrupt [i.e. an Impairment of Integrity] Conspiratorial [i.e. where two or more persons agree to commit a criminal offence or civil wrong] elements that link to Masonry in JERSEY and to Masonry in LONDON - the unspeakable aspect to which the senior members of the Legislature, the Executive & the Judiciary of JERSEY have sworn a PRIVATE OATH that overrides the PUBLIC OATH of every person in any position of seniority who acts in the administration of the public service of Jersey and/or Great Britain; [i.e. England, Wales, & Scotland], the United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland; and the British Isles [that is the UK + the 3 Crown Dependencies of i) Jersey; ii) Guernsey & iii) the Isle of Man].

    The issue that no one dares speak about in Jersey is the corrupt PRIVATE Oath of Freemasonry. Why?

    Is this due to Ignorance?;
    Is this due to Membership?;
    Is this due to Laziness in not being prepared to undertake the necessary amount of research?
    Is it due to Fear?
    What is THE REASON?

    In every matter of Law the following considerations need to be weighed with great care:
    - FACTS
    - EVIDENCE
    - LAW
    - PROSECUTION [IS HE INDEPENDENT?][Linkage from the Jersey Crown Officers to 7BR, Gray's Inn Square, London - the Chambers that are notorious for ALL being linked to being "ON THE SQUARE" (i.e. Freemasons)]
    - JUDGE [IS HE INDEPENDENT?][There is NO Independence of the Judiciary in Jersey - there can Never be any Independence of the Judiciary in Jersey as they are notorious for ALL being linked to being "ON THE SQUARE" (i.e. Freemasons)]
    - CONFLICTS OF INTEREST [between PRIVATE INTEREST [If a Freemason, HE MUST go to the aid of any Mason who asserts HE is IN DISTRESS - like the late Jimmy SaVILE (Never any possibility of a prosecution for him)(+ 2 Knighthoods from the Pope who is a Freemason & from the Queen who is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry)(her husband is also a Mason)(the Duke of Kent is the Grand Master of Masonry)]& PUBLIC DUTY to act "in the Interests of Justice"]
    - MASONIC LINKAGE [that ensures there is NO semblance of JUSTICE]

    DO WE REALLY WANT TO CONTINUE IN IGNORANCE, EXPOITATION, INSENSITIVITY, HYPOCRISY, CORRUPTION & CROOKS WHO HAVE PERVERTED & MISAPPROPRIATED THE ISLAND OF JERSEY AS THEIR OWN PERSONAL FEUDAL FIEFDOM.

    TIME TO OUT THE FREEMASONS OF JERSEY - FROM THE BETRAYING BAILHACHE BROTHERS WHO WORSHIP BAPHOMET, TUBALCAIN, JAHBULON, LUCIFER & SATURN [enjoying the "TUNNELS OF TYPHON"] TO THE CORRUPTING CESSPIT OF CROWN OFFICERS OF CHIUN, CONNECTING TO THE MASONIC MEMBERS OF THE MERCENARY MEDIA TO THE POLITICAL PEONS OF PRIDE & PREJUDICE!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks anon, for introducing a few more words to my vocabulary that I have never heard of, interesting.

      Yup, Jerseys Priests of Baal are bang at it, and I think out of your list of reasons, 'Fear' tops it with 'ignorance' coming a close second.

      I have had a very slight dabble into the world of Saturn El through vids like esoteric agenda and Kymatica, Santos Bonacci appears to have some reasonable understanding about this topic plus I like his off the wall manner. But yes, well worth a good look into this subject to give peeps a more clearer understanding of just what is going on under their noses.

      Delete
    2. THIS VIDEO I found rather enlightening when Cyril introduced me to common law last year :)

      Delete
  3. 10.Under the BAILHACHE proposals – these mean PERMANENT DICTATORSHIP BY THE MINISTER – mirroring how HITLER Achieved the same by DEMOCRACY - leading to what became TYRANNY, OPPRESSION, NAZI EVIL AUTOCRATIC DICTATORSHIP from a once GREAT Sovereign jurisdiction called GERMANY to HELLISH SUBJUGATION [now compare the same to JERSEY under the BAILHACHES].

    11.Jersey was obliged to SUFFER HARSHLY under NAZI TYRANNY & OPPRESSION to be led by DECEIVERS into a permanent ENSNAREMENT into SLAVERY – sleepwalking into the arms of crafty beguiling corrupt lawyers (in the background – linked to Sex Abuse Crimes).

    12.Bailiff/Deputy Bailiff as President/Presiding Officer of the Legislature has/have been known to regularly interfere Expressly and/or by Implication (or to Censure members in PRIVATE)(IN CAMERA – so that the Intimidation of an Assembly member is effected achieved Covertly – achieving the very same result!) as undertaking the Legislature function. Yet this grave matter creates great alarm among the Electorate of Jersey and the WILL OF THE PEOPLE as the BAILIFF/DEPUTY BAILIFF not only oversees & indirectly CONTROLS the LEGISLATURE of JERSEY, but is ALSO in charge of the EXECUTIVE & the JUDICIARY of JERSEY – the ONLY place left in EUROPE where there is NO SEPARATION OF POWERS – THE LAST FEUDAL FIEFDOM IN EUROPE. [This devious BAILHACHE envisaged change to the Jersey Constitution is not an ACCIDENT; not a TREND; but a PLAN to STIFLE DEMOCRACY & SUBJUGATE the CITIZENS FOR EVER!]

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is crystal clear that the corrupt ex Bailiff [was he not linked to abuse - hence the determination to close down any debate in Jersey and to ensure the Troy Rule [where the Executive should never be allowed to control the Committee that is meant to represent the Independent vote - those independent enough not to be tied to the controlling Executive of Jersey (who also control the Legislature & Judiciary through no separation of powers where the Bailiff, Deputy Bailiff & ex Bailiff control the Law Officers Department & hence Jersey has become an authoritarian tyrannical dictatorship - where there is no independent media - as BBC Jersey is a puppet of the Executive whilst the JEP is no more than a Pravda propaganda sheet)(the Democratic Deficit)].

    Only the Blogs are the true voice of Jersey - the expression of the People - many of the good people of integrity were obliged to be first Demonised, Isolated, Marginalised, and even Criminalised for Freedom from the Feudal tyrants who are detested by the independent thinking ordinary folk of Jersey.

    BAILHACHE is a swear word - it has become synonymous as a NAZI HITLER FASCIST who uses his Corrupt Crown Cronies to stitch up an innocent person in prison.

    In the US this is why there was a Second Amendment carefully guaranteed in the US Constitution - for "WE THE PEOPLE" to VIOLENTLY INSURRECT TYRANNY.
    [Tyranny being orchestrated by an Elective Dictator - who becomes a detested Dictator for LIFE!]

    ReplyDelete
  5. You will be well aware that COMMON law governs JERSEY - yet the duplicitous, deceitful, dissembling Corrupt Crown Officers of Jersey will want to MISREPRESENT that fact as not true - when we ALL know it is true!

    They try to hide behind the facade of a Treaty with King John - protecting Norman French - that is ALL complete hogwash!

    Authoritative Professors from Caen University have taken the trouble to give lectures in Jersey about Norman French and the Treaties of King John who have put paid to that pellucid LITANY OF LIES peddled again and again by the Corrupt Crown Officers of Jersey that continue to DISSEMBLE and peddle those MISREPRESENTATIONS & DOWNRIGHT LIES.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting how your blog is having a HUGE effect on the Crown Officers - they keep rabbiting on about the fact they don't know what to do with "the Bloggers" who are increasing in their volume - in range and in depth - now having a huge effect on the perception of Jersey "on the outside world" - talk about the insularity & zenophobia of the Crown Officers of Jersey!

    The Bloggers of Jersey are being targeted like the GREAT GANDHI was targeted by the Corrupt Crown Officers - this is what all the great bloggers are now experiencing - it demonstrates that the CORRUPT & the EVIL now FEAR you!

    YES - INDEED...

    ReplyDelete
  7. The egregious execrable BAILHACE brothers do not want the people of Jersey to discover the truth about the common law - it is a shield & it is also a sword! [That is why they have to continually hide behind their cronies - the Masonic Jurats - & their dissembling & deceits].

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks anon for your comments,the opinion of Jersey's money/power grabbing judiciary on what our law is, is just that, opinion motivated by greed.


    cyril

    ReplyDelete
  9. Greetings anon,

    what a pleasant change to get such support in the comment section, many thanks. Perhaps the Bailhache Bro's and King Birt should learn a little Shaolin philosophy, you know, to put them on the winning path!


    "To suppress a truth is to give it force beyond endurance."

    ReplyDelete