Search This Blog

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

"Alan Norton - Tuula Hoeoek - Cock Up? - Or Cover Up?"

"Jersey Lashed Into The Limelight Again!!!"

Just left click on the pics to read them :)










"Murder Of A Young Girl That
Shocked An Island Community"




Are Jersey Scared Of The Cost?
Or The Truth?
 Or Both?




"THE JERSEY WAY"




24 comments:

  1. "According to the information which we have, it does not appear that there is any material still in existence which would be suitable for DNA examination."


    Just like Jersey's Avon & Somerset Police Report hey Mike?

    ReplyDelete
  2. To anon

    Who has just left a comment which I have saved, we need names please....or silence.

    And if that is you Jon, get some help!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing suitable for DNA examination?? Come on - more conveniently missing evidence at the SoJP?

    Why not - DNA can be extracted for crimes committed years and years ago, or did the SoJP in their amateurish (as ever) way think that this would never come back to bite them in the bum?

    Yet another person seeking justice which will no doubt be denied them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian.

    Rico will be discussing this subject, and others tomorrow NIGHT

    ReplyDelete
  5. If Scotland yard played a part in the investigation then would they not have kept evidence? ''does not appear'' there is any material still in existence is not a flat out no evidence available, is it? Someone is covering all bases in the event evidence is available.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr Evans, I don't thank you for reproducing the picture of Mr. Le Cocq. I'm reminded of what an idiot he is. The man was a self-regarding dope back in the days when I worked with him. I imagine that's why he was selected for his present job. Every smart Jersey lawyer of any calibre knew perfectly well what becoming Solicitor General or Attorney General entailed; essentially, doing what you were told by the Bailhache Brothers, and in particular maintaining the concealment of their various ultra vires abuses of power, cover-ups and political protection-rackets.

    Sadly for Mr. Le Cocq he is now a "made man", if you understand the expression, and is henceforth wholly committed to the "enterprise" with no way out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr? Mr is a legal fiction, a title, I have never had a title bestowed on me in my life! The only thing that Jersey has bestowed on me is grief and pain, but they will pay for that eventually....Thanks for the enlightening comment :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I would love to see Barry Scheck deal with this case and claims of no evidence.

    http://www.innocenceproject.org/about/Mission-Statement.php

    ReplyDelete
  9. Another shocking post by Aangirfan who has again featured the Jersey Bloggers.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Many thanks to those of you who have signed the petition on behalf of Leah, the Abuse Survivors, and indeed, yourselves. For those good Men & Women who have not seen it, please click on THIS LINK to sign. Many thanks :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jersey should have the most profound duty to this man to provide every piece of evidence they can.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Trevor Pitman just posted this on his own site and I thought it should be shared.




    Watching the video of Channel news, even putting aside Senator Philip Bailhache's childish, snide and generally pathetic lies about me in the States last week (no doubt to distract from the latest example of his legendary incompetence)you still have to say it is somewhat ironic that Chief Minister Ian Gorst would send this man over to the UK to talk about 'cover ups'.

    Just the Senator's willingness to tell downright lies to the Assembly in falsely and maliciously stating that some of the bogus Electoral Commission submissions I highlighted for him were anything to do with my faimly (please tell us who, Senator?)is likely mark enough of how desperate and out of his depth politically Mr. Bailhache is.

    Yet has it really escaped Ian Gorst's notice that this is the same man who was so grossly incompetent, negligent or, to be fair, perhaps just plain stupid (you choose which one you think most likely) that whilst Attorney General he allowed the convicted paedophile Roger Holland to be sworn into the Hon. Police!

    A decision, of course, which if my memory serves me led directly to more innocent young women being abused - young wormen who would otherwise have been safe. he should have resigned or at least been sacked.

    A man who was, if my memory serves me (which I'm confident that it does) also revealed in the banned and suppressed Sharp Report to have been Chairman of the Victoria College Board of Governors when Jurat John Le Breton was writing that another paedophile, Andrew Jervis-Dykes (speciality plying young boys with alcohol on school boat trips then videoing himself sexually abusing them!) might not have 'a case to answer' at all.

    The same Mr. Bailhache in fact who not only later claimed in truly pitiful fashion the excuse that back in those days it 'wasn't known' how dangerous paedophiles like Holland were; but also hijacked the Liberation Day speech to make his revolting speech belittling Haut de la Garenne set against the global media frenzy that surrounded it.

    I ask - is this really the best you can do, Chief Minister?

    And in the same breath you expect us all to believe that you are serious about support for an independent Committee of Inquiry into 'historic' child abuse?

    Face facts, Senator Gorst, you are Chief Minister will all the powers that go with it. Yet it took me, a backbencher, to highlight the reality that you and your two predecessors in the role had done nothing to prevent individuals sitting amongst the ranks of Jurats who should not have been anywhere near a court - other than perhaps to appear before one for their appalling failings!

    And yes, the further fact is isn't it, Chief Minister - and I know this because I put you on the spot - you still haven't even bothered to read the Sharp Report as I had advised you to.

    To think...I actually voted for you to get the 'Top Job'. Can I ever forgive myself - even if the alternative was even worse?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Ian.

    Just put up the Audio of the Interviews that happen today on the BBC Radio, with Mr Norton, his Lawyer & Mr Hemming MP.

    You & your readers can Listen HERE

    We, as much as we think we Know, just have not got a CLUE about the goings on of this Lovely Island!

    What will come out NEXT?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you so much for this TJW, it answers the question in the title of this post...."COVER UP!!!"

    My God, I have never (well that's not true) heard such a damning testimony against the States of Jersey and their grubby little system of Lawlessness!!!

    I IMPLORE EVERYONE ON THE PLANET TO VISIT "The Jersey Way" at the link directly above and just listen to what the scum did to this man.

    Even "Conned Him" in his "Death Cell" by writing that he "Did Not Wish To Appeal His Verdict"

    This Disgusting Island Makes Me Sick To My Stomach!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There seem to be people on your site who were interested in the Alan Norton case. In the event that anyone could help or just out of interest you might wish to visit his new website
      www.TravestyofJustice.co.uk

      Delete
    2. Thanks for your LINK Kate, please feel free to post when you wish :)

      Delete
  15. not hard to see why leah is not welcoms

    ReplyDelete
  16. today's 'rag' editorial....stinking of desperation!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I know, I will be publishing it all after tea along with some very damning links :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE THAT WAS SENTENCED WHILE LE BRETON WAS JURAT ON THE CASE WHO COULD APPEAL AGAINST THEIR SENTANCE FOR ALL THE REASONS STATED WHY LE BRETON SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A JURAT? THIS WOULD BRING IT ALL INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bailache to meet Mr Hemmings,lisening to Bailache on the radio today it sounds as if he is going to this meeting with the idea of putting Mr Hemmings in his place I do hope Mr Hemmings records the meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Comment at 8:23. I was actually thinking the same thing myself earlier Mr. Hemmings should have witness's and inform Mr. Bailhache he is recording any meetings.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mr Hemming should keep his trap shut and 'NOT TELL' Ballache that he is recording him, that is how I have caught out 9 Jersey police officers perjuring themselves against me. Tell em nowt and watch em lie :)

    ReplyDelete