Search This Blog

Friday, 17 February 2012

"Scotland Join The Ranks Of Jersey Paedophile Scum"

Robert Green Jailed For 12 Months

17 February 2012 13:16:25
100% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

  Robert Green given 1 year sentence by Sheriff Bowen
 Posted on February 17, 2012 by Admin
  Robert Green has been given a 1 year jail sentence by Sheriff Principle Bowen.
  This is broken down as 9 months for Breach of the Peace, and a further 3 months for Breach of Bail Conditions.
  Robert is said to have called out to his supporters as he was being led down
 "Don’t worry about me, I shall be fine"

Robert Green - Hollie Demands Justice campaigner jailed today in Scotland.
The Hollie Demands Justice campaign very much regrets the decision today of the Sheriff Court in
Stonehaven to deprive Robert Green of his Liberty.
Despite breaches of Mr Green's human rights and repeated irregularities in law and process by the
police, the legal profession and the court system since Robert Green was first arrested in February
2010, the Sheriff Court in Stonehaven, Sheriff Principle Edward Bowen saw fit to curtail his
freedom, sentencing him to 1 year in jail (9 months for Breach of the Peace, 3 months for Breach of
Bail conditions).
Robert has been a most robust and valued campaigner on behalf of Hollie Greig and her mother
Anne, in seeking justice for the wrongs inflicted upon Hollie, exposing the lack of a duty of care
from those in positions of trust, the perjury of Grampian Police and highlighting the nefarious
nature of the legal system and the Establishment in both Scotland and England.
Anne Greig said today:
Hollie and I would like to publicly thank Robert Green for his
bravery, his tireless work and his dedication to Hollies cause,
her search for justice. We consider ourselves most fortunate to
have found such a man of principle to act and campaign on our
behalf, whose selfless actions have taken him into conflict with
those who would abuse their power and powerful connections to
evade justice. Our disappointment with the legal system in
Scotland now knows no bounds.
In our opinion Robert Green should be awarded a medal, not a
criminal conviction.
It is our hope that Robert's legal team will mount a speedy and
energetic appeal on his behalf to release him from this enforced
loss of his liberty that he most certainly does not deserve and
we now state publicly that we will have fears for his well-being
whilst in prison. We will hold responsible and accountable those
who have seen fit to incarcerate him should any interference
with his being or any harm befall him.
I would like to thank all the wonderful people who have
supported Hollie, Robert and myself during this long and ongoing
campaign, especially those who have repeatedly made the long
trip to Scotland regularly giving support to Robert during his
many hearings.
Both Hollie and myself extend our heartfelt wishes, our thoughts
and our prayers are with Robert today.
Far from seeing the jailing of Robert as a setback, the Hollie Demands Justice campaign will be
stepping up the pressure as Anne Greig will now vigorously move forward with her High Court
appeal and is currently discussing the timing of mounting a series of private prosecutions
against those who have abused their positions of trust, many of whom have now perjured
themselves in the courts and on the public record.
This campaign will not be silenced, it will move forward relentlessly until every possible avenue is
exhausted, no matter how long that takes. No stone will be left unturned until Justice is not just
done, but that justice is seen to be done.
Notes for Editors
1) The Hollie Demands Justice campaign was founded in November 2007. The campaign website
can be found at:
2) Further details to the background of the campaign can be found in About Hollie:
3) The background to the Trial of Robert Green is well documented in coverage by Scottish Law
Reporter HERE and further coverage of the conflict of interest of Sheriff Bowen, the Hollie Greig
case along with a recent investigation into the knighthood of Angiolini , apparently recommended
by the Scottish Government.
4) Further information can be requested by using the 'Contact Us' form on the campaign website
 Robert requested by email yesterday the following.
If I go down, this is the address to circulate, if you would.
So please get writing, Robert needs all the support he can get.

 Trial on Friday, 17th February
 This will be my last blog prior to the impending trial.
  Since it is difficult to predict what may occur, I would again like to take this opportunity of thanking all of those wonderful people who have supported Hollie, Anne and me throughout this campaign and to those who have attended my many court hearings. To those of you who may be able to come along on Friday, I shall be most grateful and pleased to see you.
  My fate is not in the hands of a jury, but of one man, Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen.
 Since the trial, it has been discovered that this individual lacked the professional and personal integrity to divulge his relationship, for over ten years, on the board of an organisation with a fellow member who had been cited as a witness for the defence. This relationship on the board lasted until May last year, when Bowen and the cited witness left within 24 hours of each other. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that the two were at least, fairly well acquainted.
 Moreover, on Bowen`s intercession, the witness, Elish Angiolini, was prevented from having to attend court and provide answers on oath under cross-examination, hence displaying the prospect of disadvantaging the defence. Given that justice needs to be seen to be done, it would be difficult to argue against the view that Sheriff Bowen was not competent to adjudicate at the trial, owing to a reasonable supposition that a conflict of interest may well be seen to exist.

 A formal complaint has been lodged with the appropriate authorities, which has been formally acknowledged today and Bowen will be challenged in court in connection with his failure to disclose. One would hope that under Scottish Law, the requirement to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth in court extends to members of the judiciary.
  Bowen`s conduct so far has been instrumental in my having a criminal record inflicted upon me and the prospect of a prison sentence, quite apart from the way my human rights have been persistently breached from the time of my initial arrest.
  It may be a good time to note, in comparison, a few examples of how actual sex offenders in Scotland are treated.
  This week it was announced that Liam Gibson, described as one of Scotland`s most notorious purveyors of child pornography, was spared a jail sentence despite Lothian & Borders Police discovering 50,000 images of child pornography at his home.
  In 2009, Douglas Haggarty QC, a senior member of the Legal Aid Board with the responsibility and influence in deciding if I should be granted legal aid, was found to have committed a sexual act with a 17-year-old male prostitute in the public toilet of British Home Stores, St Enoch Centre, Glasgow on a Saturday afternoon at a time when the store was full of families out shopping. Mr Haggarty was not only spared prison, but was allowed to retain his lucrative job in a position of public trust.
  In 2001, when Elish Angiolini was busy covering up over Hollie`s allegations, in an unrelated case, a 22-year-old man who admitted to raping a 10-year-old girl and 7-year-old boy was allowed to walk free. This was reported in The Times and The Telegraph in May of that year. Angiolini was subsequently forced into a public apology for her incompetence. This monumental blunder did not prevent her climbing to the highest office in the justice system.
  Then, of course, we can mention the repeated Grampian Police and Crown Office failings over the Hollie Greig case. At the outset, Hollie`s father should have been arrested and had his computer seized, as Dr Frances Kelly`s medical examination, accepted by Grampian Police, supported Hollie`s allegations within three weeks of Hollie first making them in May 2000.
  All this may be of some interest when my sentence is announced. In this Kafkaesque country, where right is wrong and wrong is right , the indications are that anyone who exposes police failures and tries to protect children from being raped is likely to be much more seriously dealt with than the actual perpetrators.
  The eminent Ian Hamilton QC described the way that Scotland is currently being governed as being akin to fascism. It is an opinion that is not easy to disagree with.
  Scotland is a fine country with some of the most decent and humane people you are likely to find anywhere on Earth. It is so sad that its governance has fallen into the hands of a cabal whose members have characters that are diametrically at odds with the best traditions of those of the overwhelming majority of Scottish people.
  Thank you all and God bless you
 Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online...


  1. Ian.

    What an outrage, Jersey twinned with Scotland. This, and Stuart Syvret's case might meet this CRITERIA

  2. Ian.

    Guernsey has a newspaper that campaigns for victims/survivors of Child Abuse and not the PERPETRATORS OF IT

  3. I did mention once before that someone in Jersey ought to link up with Guernsey, having read some of the articles that the Guernsey Press has run in full support of the campaign, it puts Jersey to shame, but more so, because although owned by the same owners, Guernsey Press is a shinning example of what the JEP is not, and that the reason can only be laid at the door of one Mr?