Search This Blog

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

"Is Terry Le Sewer A Qualified Judge?"

Call to change courts evidence warnings by....the 'outgoing' Chief Minister???

 

Related Stories

The way evidence is handled in Jersey's courts could change under plans being looked at by the States.
Jersey's Chief Minister Terry Le Sueur has proposed amendments to the Criminal Justice Law.
The senator wants judges to decide whether it is necessary to warn juries to treat any evidence with caution.
At present, judges must tell jurors it is dangerous to convict if evidence from a child, accomplice or sex assault victim has not been corroborated.

The Jersey Law Commission has recommended abolishing this rule, as has happened in England, and instead leave it to the judge's discretion.
Senator Le Sueur said he also wanted to make it clear that evidence can be given in the magistrate's court and youth court through a live television link, in the same way as it can be in the Royal Court.

Another recommendation is that no formal proof should be required to establish whether the victim of child pornography is under the age of 16.
The minister said that should be judged from the evidence as a whole.
The States are due to debate the proposals on 6 December.

More on This Story

Related Stories

4 comments:

  1. Ian

    I rarley read The Rag, so haven't seen the whole story - but, on the face of it - just going from this little clip on your blog - I don't see the problem with what is being proposed.

    Have I missed something?

    Stuart

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stuart

    I think it sets a dangerous precedent when not informing jurists fully of the facts and possible consequences in any case.

    Our courts are bent enough as it is, especially against people they do not like, a fair trial must be exactly that....fair

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Stuart is right about the law in general circumstances, but may be risky to allow anything so pivotal to be left to the sole discretion of a Jersey judge. It may sound like a common sense change for a less corrupt jurisdiction, but it would undoubtedly be used against the abuse victims, dissident politicians like Stuart, or anyone else whom a judge wishes to sway opinion of.

    Elle

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is easier to buy one judge than to buy the law!

    ReplyDelete