Search This Blog

Sunday, 9 October 2011

"Common Law - Admiralty Law - And Your Straw Man" Part 6

"Parking Tick-et's - A Test Case" part 2
We will be keeping readers informed of any developments as we progress.

Before we start this posting, we would like the reader to know, and acknowledge, that anything in this posting is "NOT" Legal Advice, and should "NOT" be perceived as such. Everything written here is merely our own theory.
Please also note, that anyone using these tactics or copying what we have done here, "MUST" know how to defend themselves properly in a courtroom. Lawyer's and Judges have a wealth of knowledge and trickery to get you to consent to their codes of practice, thereby rendering you liable to their penalties after you have been coaxed into giving up your "Inalienable Rights".
"Common Law is the greatest protection anyone has against tyrannical Government and injustice. The States of Jersey have trampled the Law of the land into the dirt."
  
"The Great Deception"

Common Law - Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man PART 1
Common Law - Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man PART 2
Common Law - Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man PART 3
Common Law - Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man PART 4
Common Law - Admiralty Law And Your Straw Man PART 5



Please click the link on PART 5 above
for the first part of this story of extortion

SO, the public servants at the town hall continue to remain silent, and in dishonour in this matter.
According to their 'alleged' court summons, Paul is due in court on Monday afternoon, and still no reply last week to our Lawful notices. We decided to send a final notice with a fee schedule attached in case of Paul's unlawful arrest or imprisonment. We also copied it to Chief Police Officer Mike Bowron and Attorney General Tim Le Cocq.

Did we get a response?

Below is our final Notice and Fee Schedule

Paul:Le Bourgeois
03/October/2011
09.00 am GMT

NOTICE OF CLAIM OF RIGHT

Chef De Police D. Scaife
Connetable A.S. Crowcroft
Parish Hall....Ref  SF01888259

Dear Sir
Further to the three lawful Notices I have served upon you in connection with this matter, and which are all now cured, I now serve a fourth and final Notice. I have lawfully, and in good faith, attempted discussion and negotiation in this matter. You, as a government agent, have failed even to acknowledge my sincere efforts, let alone respond in substance. I have conditionally accepted every offer that your company has made, I feel I can do no more than that.

Notice to agent is Notice to principal and vice-versa

I claim that pursuant to any action by any government and/or any principal, member, employee, agent, servant, person thereof in Right of Great Britain, a province, a municipality, or Crown dependency:
“I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily or intentionally and I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any contract or commercial agreement not revealed to myself, which are my rights pursuant to Common Law”

Furthermore, I claim that, “Ignorance of the Law” is not a lawful or legal claim when used by the Crown, government principals, employees, agents and justice system participants at any and all levels to my harm or detriment, especially by those claiming limited liability.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is (GB £250.00) TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated and (GB £2,500.00) TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarised consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressor who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officer, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim that the law of agent and principal does apply and that service upon one is equal to service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaim or dispute publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within SEVEN (7) days from 10.00am on the third day of October 2011.
Responses must be under oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in a Notary Office no later than seven days from 10.00am on the third day of October 2011.
Failure to register a dispute against the claim made herein will result in an automatic default judgement and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self
Paul:Le Bourgeois
Any Notarised responses may be emailed to me between 10.00am and 11.30am on the 10th October 2011 at     ******************


Sincerely, and without ill will, vexation or frivolity.



Paul:Le Bourgeois

All Rights Reserved
c.c  Mr Mike Bowron, Mr Tim Le Cocq

SO, did we get a response? 

YES we did, perhaps it may be that they have realised that even 'they' cannot ignore Lawful Notices!
OR, was it the threat of the Fee Schedule at £2,500 per hour?
What is clear is that they still persist with their orders, bullying, and threats,
THE JERSEY WAY.

Below is the response we received at the eleventh hour, and which looks to me as though they are trying to salvage some small amount of honour before court.

The Response

Now "THEY" are trying to make out that "WE" are in dishonour!

Deconstruction of the above nonsense

1/ Firstly, I am saddened that Mr Crowcroft has not had the courage to put his name to this document, after the Graham Power episode in which he fought so courageously for the side of good, he has now lost the personal respect he earned from me.

2/  They have had FOUR whole months to make any kind of reasonable response, why leave it until a week before their "alleged" court case?

3/ "The vehicle is registered in your name" Yes, but owned by the States of Jersey via their deception in tricking people into registering their private automobiles and therefore unknowingly and unwittingly signing up to the States of Jersey's silent adhesion contracts!!!

4/ "The parking notice gave you an opportunity to pay the £30 fee" This is the fee they say is a "voluntary payment"??? Paul did not volunteer to pay it, but chose rather to keep his very hard earned cash in his OWN pocket!!! NOTE: They also state that it is a "FEE"? They dare not describe it as a "FINE" as the Law Officers Department are fully aware that it is totally illegal to fine members of the community for parking on their own land, and that they have paid for via their taxes.

5/ They then state Paul failed to turn up for 'their' appointment! Who the hell are they to dictate to any free man where to go, and when!!! Adolf Would Be Proud

6/ Again, they then babble on about the fictitious "Summons" that is in fact, just a "Notice".

7/ "The facts can be heard by a magistrate in accordance with the law" WHAT LAW?
Their alleged lawful "Article 89 (1)" is nothing more than a statute, a statute that can only be given the force of law with Paul's consent. As you have already read from our previous posting, Paul has "NOT" given his consent for these statutes to be given the force of law!!! The only option now open to them is to try to get Paul into court and trick him into giving the court his consent tacitly. In other words, cheat and trick him with deceptive words that he cannot hope to "understand".

8/ "I would like to give you one final chance to speak with a Centennier". Even now, see how they try to pressure and threaten their "VICTIM OF FRAUD" into submission as the "alleged" court date draws near?

9/ FINALLY, "If you fail to attend the inquiry, your name will be called in the court"
SO WHAT!
They can get a bloody Soprano to sing it if they like, it matters not. What matters is that Scaife, Crowcroft and Co have acted CRIMINALLY!!! Yes Criminally!!! I will explain how, and why, after their "BULLY BOY" deadline :)

TO END...
Our Response To Their Greed, Bullying and Harassment
& THEY ARE STILL IN DISHONOUR!

Paul:Le Bourgeois



06/October/2011





Chef De Police D. Scaife

Connetable A.S. Crowcroft

Michel Le Troquer

Parish Hall....Ref  SF01888259







Dear Sir



Thank you for your long awaited attempt at discussion in this matter, albeit at the eleventh hour.

As I have explained previously, I have still not received the summons that was alleged to have been sent to me, and I do not consent to your authority over me. I am offering the following terms to stay in honour, as I have been throughout this affair, and have at all such times acted lawfully.

Unfortunately I am not able to meet with a representative of your company on Friday the 7th of August, as I have a prior engagement.

I am also busy on Saturday the 8th of October, however, I am free on Sunday the 9th of August between the hours of 12 and 2pm should a representative of your company wish to discuss the issue at hand.

If this is acceptable to your company representative, I can be emailed any time before Sunday at the address below.

P



Sincerely, and without ill will, vexation or frivolity.







Paul:Le Bourgeois

All Rights Reserved


We hope you are enjoying this little excursion into the unknown world of LAW.
As a good friend of mine always says
"Law is a complex set of multilingual, multi faceted made purposely complex pile of bollocks. Although hard to read, it is not as hard to understand when you know their code."

30 comments:

  1. If I understand this correctly, the "fine" has been replaced with a "fee".

    Isn't there an onus upon the company to clearly display its fees? So if I were to go to a pub, the prices should be clearly displayed for everyone to see. If I were to park a car 'illegally', where is the notice that displays this said fee?

    the Beano is not the Rag

    ReplyDelete
  2. i think you are going to get egg on your face

    ReplyDelete
  3. getting egg on your face is a lot more palatable than getting on your knees to fillate these criminals


    c

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excellent comment at number two!!!

    Just what Jersey, and this, and other websites need to progress.

    Just where would we be without your rational and intuitive thinking.

    People like you make our job so much easier and pleasurable :)

    Now, if you would kindly crawl back into your hole, we can proceed with your enlightening wisdom on board....

    LATER DOUCHE

    ReplyDelete
  5. oh sorry did i hit a nerve Ian ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Absolutely NOT!!!

    But what you did do is confirm that you are the same government loving troll that posted the two comments yesterday about Rob Duhamel :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. no you are so wrong .i agree with 90% of your posts but this one is a waist of time.whats the point ?such a small thing to wright about. pay the bloody fine and fight something worth fighting for

    ReplyDelete
  8. "You are so wrong"

    NO I AM NOT SO WRONG, and you have now changed to a different I.P Address which matches the comment about someone's son on previous posting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. well that is crap ian ,well if that's your game then i don't think i want to support you on other thing any moor .and i thought it was p b that lied

    ReplyDelete
  10. You have now changed I.P.Address again!

    209.85.161.202
    209.85.160.201
    And now
    209.85.213.201

    Bye Bye the :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Ian,

    Oooh the conflict, not gonna say don't worry about it 'cos I know you won't, I know of a few other conflicts around, made me smile as I'm sure it's all down to the full moon.

    C-L-P

    ReplyDelete
  12. Full Moon isn't until the 12th Cindy :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Our exposed troll is now bombarding me with insults!

    Sorry Troll, Did I Hit A Nerve?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Of course you are correct Ian, but there must be some sort of build up, 95% isn't far off full?

    By the way where did all the Cancer info go? I was looking forward to reading that over the weekend.

    Keep up the good work.

    C-L-P

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sorry Cindy about the cancer video's

    Shortly after I put them up on the blog, YouTube removed them from their site!

    I wonder why?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Damn ! well I guess we know the answer to that- can't have us knowing these things, we might end up refusing the cut, poison and burn treatment they would like to kill us with, whilst they bleed us dry paying themselves for doing it.

    Thanks for trying Ian, I should have been quicker.


    C-L-P

    ReplyDelete
  17. Best I can do for you is THIS LINK.
    It is pretty comprehensive.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think the original video's came from THIS LINK which is easy to access with your first name and mail address.

    Hope this is helpful :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks Ian,

    Sorry but you caught me eating a chancre with a french stick, imagine the mess, couldn't touch a keyboard to say I appreciate your time.

    C-L-P

    ReplyDelete
  20. In your notices you keep refering to a Company. What Company might this be?

    ReplyDelete
  21. "What company would that be?"

    Why the Parish of St Helier of course....

    ReplyDelete
  22. Since when has the Parish of St Helier been a Company?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Since Jersey has been a Corporation I shouldn't wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  24. OK, so since when has Jersey been a Corporation?

    ReplyDelete
  25. 'Since 1892' - No it hasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Go away troll, can't be bothered with your idiocy anymore. If you have nothing better to do than talk frivolous garbage, go post on your own blog.

    ReplyDelete
  27. And fuck off to you twat - but I do suggest you get your facts right.

    PS - you were a shit carpet fitter

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sounds like Jon's Wet Mattress is going to get another soaking!!! PMSL

    ReplyDelete